{"id":2873,"date":"2010-01-20T07:49:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-20T12:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/2010\/01\/rollers-hissos-and-plymmies\/"},"modified":"2011-01-27T10:41:07","modified_gmt":"2011-01-27T15:41:07","slug":"rollers-hissos-and-plymmies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/2010\/01\/rollers-hissos-and-plymmies\/","title":{"rendered":"Rollers, Hissos and Plymmies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"picright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_Bolls-RentleyWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_Bolls-RentleyWeb-Feature.jpg\" width=\"220\" height=\"216\" alt=\"Bolls-Rentley Storm Cloud\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve heard it said that in the upper reaches of collector car circles it&#8217;s considered coarse and crass to refer to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-6-13_RollsPIILFWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"Rolls-Royce Phantom II drophead\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Rolls-Royce<\/a> as a &#8220;Roller,&#8221; although &#8220;Rolls&#8221; is generally acceptable. The same goes for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_HispanoAlphonseWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1913 Hispano-Suiza Alphonse XIII\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Hispano-Suiza<\/a>: &#8220;Hispano,&#8221; certainly, but never &#8220;Hisso.&#8221; Why, then, does everyone refer to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-6-13_ChairmansChoiceWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1931 Duesenberg J convertible victoria\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Duesenberg<\/a> as a &#8220;Duesie&#8221;? In fact, the nickname is so ingrained in the language that it now describes anything that is grand or large or immense, either good or bad. I&#8217;m not sure about &#8220;Bug&#8221; for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-2-11_HoweTy57RFWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"Bugatti Type 57 Atlante\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Bugatti<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Why is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-17_Cadillac1959FinsWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1959 Cadillac fins\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Cadillac<\/a> called a &#8220;Caddy,&#8221; while a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_1960LincolnLimoWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1960 Lincoln limousine\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Lincoln<\/a> is never a &#8220;Linky&#8221;? A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-9-23_57NomadWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1957 Chevy Nomad\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Chevrolet<\/a> can be a Chevy (in fact the manufacturer promotes it as such), but Mopar mavens recoil when a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-4-1_1953PlymLFWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1953 Plymouth Cranbrook sedan - front\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Plymouth<\/a> is called &#8220;Plymmie.&#8221; &#8220;Studie&#8221; (or &#8220;Stude&#8221;) is all right for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-10-21_61LarkWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1961 Studebaker Lark VI\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Studebaker<\/a>, but a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-6-13_34PkrdLeBaronWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1934 Packard LeBaron phaeton\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Packard<\/a> is never a &#8220;Packy.&#8221; If someone tells you he&#8217;s got a &#8220;Merc,&#8221; you need to know what continent he&#8217;s on. It could be either a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-2-11_BraceofMercedesFWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"Brace of Mercedes - front\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Mercedes<\/a> or a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-12-23_49MercSptSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1949 Mercury Sport Sedan\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Mercury<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Somehow it&#8217;s frequently okay to shorten car names to a single syllable: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2005-6-8_Greenwich2005JagMkVWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Jaguar Mk V drophead coupe\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Jaguar<\/a> to &#8220;Jag,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-10-21_57OldsFiestaWagWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1957 Oldsmobile Fiesta hardtop station wagon\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Oldsmobile<\/a> to &#8220;Olds,&#8221; but why is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_1930Daimler20-30Web-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1039 Daimler 20\/30 Limousine\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Daimler<\/a> never a &#8220;Dame&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>The single syllable cars, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-6-13_39FordWoodyWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1939 Ford Standard station wagon\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Ford<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-6-13_30CordL29Web-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1930 L29 Cord Murphy phaeton\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Cord<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_1964Dodge440Web-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1964 Dodge 440\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Dodge<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2008-9-3_1949NashAmbWeb-Large.jpg\" title=\"1949 Nash Ambassador\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"imglink\">Nash<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2005-6-8_Greenwich2005StutzH&#038;DWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Stutz M8\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Stutz<\/a>, escape nicknames entirely, but how about the two-syllable makes: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_1953HudsonHornetWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"1953 Hudson Hornet\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Hudson<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-10-21_27BuickWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1927 Buick coupe\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Buick<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_1933Marmon16Web-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1933 Marmon Sixteen\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Marmon<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2006-1-25_59EdselHersheyWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"1959 Edsel Corsair\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Edsel<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2006-2-22_Franklin1929LFWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"1929 Franklin coupe - front\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Franklin<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/e\/eb\/1st-Saturn-SL1.jpg\">Saturn<\/a>, and even three-syllable <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2009-10-21_37DeSotoWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1937 DeSoto sedan\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">DeSoto<\/a>? I&#8217;ve never heard any of them abbreviated.<\/p>\n<p>It seems logical to make <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_1971GTOJudgeWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"1971 Pontiac GTO Judge\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Pontiac<\/a> into &#8220;Ponti,&#8221; but Pontiac partisans apparently prefer &#8220;Poncho&#8221; instead.<\/p>\n<p>If you can shed any light on the above mysteries, please <a href=\"mailto:carport@kitfoster.com\">direct it<\/a> to the CarPort, or perhaps you have similar questions of your own.<\/p>\n<p><p>Finally, a couple of notes on pronunciation. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2010-1-20_Porsche911TargaWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"Porsche 911 Targa\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Porsche<\/a> is a two-syllable word, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2005-8-30_LAAMJeepster4x4FrontWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"1949 Willys Jeepster\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Willys<\/a> does not rhyme with &#8220;Phillies.&#8221; I knew John North Willys&#8217; grandson, and he told me the family name was always pronounced &#8220;Willis.&#8221; So, too, did the company&#8217;s television commercials call the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/2008\/11\/short-flight-of-aero-willys.html\">Aero Willys<\/a> car back in the 1950s.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve heard it said that in the upper reaches of collector car circles it&#8217;s considered coarse and crass to refer to a Rolls-Royce as a &#8220;Roller,&#8221; although &#8220;Rolls&#8221; is generally acceptable. The same goes for Hispano-Suiza: &#8220;Hispano,&#8221; certainly, but never &#8220;Hisso.&#8221; Why, then, does everyone refer to a Duesenberg as a &#8220;Duesie&#8221;? In fact, the<span style=\"color:#aaa\">&#8230;.<\/span> <br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/2010\/01\/rollers-hissos-and-plymmies\/\">Read full article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,12,15],"tags":[41,68,54,56,64,62,73,66,53,70,63,71,99,67,60,55,69,36,59,65,61,58,52,74,75,50,72,57,25,76],"class_list":["post-2873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-american-cars","category-british-cars","category-spanish-cars","tag-bugatti","tag-buick","tag-cadillac","tag-chevrolet","tag-cord","tag-daimler","tag-desoto","tag-dodge","tag-duesenberg","tag-edsel","tag-ford","tag-franklin","tag-hispano-suiza","tag-hudson","tag-jaguar","tag-lincoln","tag-marmon","tag-mercedes-benz","tag-mercury","tag-nash","tag-oldsmobile","tag-packard","tag-plymouth","tag-pontiac","tag-porsche","tag-rolls-royce","tag-saturn","tag-studebaker","tag-stutz","tag-willys"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2873"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2873\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3597,"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2873\/revisions\/3597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}