{"id":2722,"date":"2007-01-10T03:12:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-10T08:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/2007\/01\/low-priced-three\/"},"modified":"2010-12-30T12:02:03","modified_gmt":"2010-12-30T17:02:03","slug":"low-priced-three","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/2007\/01\/low-priced-three\/","title":{"rendered":"The Low-Priced Three"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"picright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_LoPriced3Web-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_LoPriced3Web-Feature.jpg\" alt=\"The Low-Priced Three\" height=\"131\" width=\"220\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alfred_P._Sloan\">Alfred P. Sloan&#8217;s<\/a> doctrine of &#8220;a car for every purse and purpose&#8221; was firmly entrenched by the early 1930s. General Motors had a clear cascade of makes, from Cadillac at the top of the market to Chevrolet at the bottom. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Walter_Chrysler\">Walter Chrysler<\/a> recognized the phenomenon, which led him to introduce price-leader Plymouth to balance his namesake Chrysler. <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Henry_ford\">Henry Ford<\/a>, whose name was synonymous with economy, left his own car at the bottom, forsaking the marquee position to Lincoln. Chevrolet, Ford and Plymouth, then, came to be known as the &#8220;Low-Priced Three,&#8221; the place where a family of modest means would begin their car shopping.<\/p>\n<p>The landscape was well established. In 1932, a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1932PontiacWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1932 Pontiac Six\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Pontiac Six<\/a> cost 22 percent more than a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1932ChevSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1932 Chevrolet\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Chevy<\/a> (based on the proverbial lowest-priced four-door sedans), a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.duricy.com\/~desoto\/exhibitions\/advertising.html\">DeSoto<\/a> 43 percent more than a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1932PlymPBSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1932 Plymouth PB\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Plymouth PB<\/a> (Dodge cost more than DeSoto in 1932, remember). Ford&#8217;s bigger brother, <a href=\"http:\/\/fwhk8549.hp.infoseek.co.jp\/images\/car\/vintage\/1932lincoln.jpg\">Lincoln<\/a>, didn&#8217;t really figure into this theory, as at $3,200 it was mega-times the cost of a $540 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_ModelBFordWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1932 Ford Model B\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Model B Ford (this car<\/a> was owned by my parents before my time &#8211; the children playing are my older cousins Becky and Ben).<\/p>\n<p>In 1940, things hadn&#8217;t changed much. The &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940PontiSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940 Pontiac\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Pontiac<\/a> premium&#8221; over <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940ChevSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940 Chevrolet\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Chevy<\/a> had risen to 25 percent, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940DodgeSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940Dodge\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Dodge<\/a>,  now the lower-middle Mopar, cost 15 percent more than <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940PlymSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940 Plymouth\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Plymouth<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940FordSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940 Fords\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Ford<\/a> had a middle sibling, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940MercSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940 Mercury\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Mercury<\/a>, that cost 32 percent more. In 1950 the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950PontiSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Pontiac\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Pontiac<\/a>&#8211;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950ChevSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Chevrolet\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Chevy<\/a> margin was down to 18 percent, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950MercSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Mercury\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Mercury<\/a>&#8211;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950FordSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Ford\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Ford<\/a> difference had risen to 38 percent and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950DodgeSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Dodge\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Dodge<\/a> kept its 15 percent lead over <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950PlymSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Plymouth\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Plymouth<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Sixties changed all that. The new compact cars from the Big Three, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2006-8-16_60CorvairWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Corvair\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Corvair<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2005-5-11_60FalconBrochureWeb-Large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Illustration of 1960 Falcon\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\"><br \/>\nFalcon<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2006-9-27_Valiant001Web-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Valiant brochure\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Valiant<\/a>, entered their companies&#8217; price ladders at the bottom, commanding 12 to 15 percent less than &#8220;full size&#8221; cars. There were no Pontiac or Dodge compacts, and Mercury&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.plan59.com\/images\/JPGs\/cmt60dock.jpg\">Comet<\/a> arrived late in the year, priced just four percent more than a Falcon. Among the big cars, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1960PontCataSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Pontiac Catalina\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Pontiac<\/a> cost 16 percent over <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1960ChevBiscSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Chevrolet Biscayne\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Chevy<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_60MercMontySdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Mercury Monterey sedan\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Mercury<\/a> was 19 percent more than <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_60FordSdRFWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Ford\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Ford<\/a>. But something ominous happened at Dodge. The new <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hubcapcafe.com\/ocs\/pages01\/dodg6002.htm\">Dodge Dart Seneca<\/a> cost less than one percent more than a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1960PlymHTSdWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1960 Plymouth\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">full-sized Plymouth<\/a>. When Dodge got a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1961ValiantLFWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1961 Valiant\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Valiant<\/a>-clone, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.trombinoscar.com\/dodge\/dg610101.jpg\">Lancer<\/a>, in 1961, its price premium was a scant one percent.<\/p>\n<p>The tide had turned. Twenty years later, Pontiac&#8217;s margin over Chevy (model for model, <a href=\"http:\/\/content.answers.com\/main\/content\/wp\/en\/thumb\/6\/68\/250px-1980PontiacPhoenixLJ5door.jpg\">Phoenix <\/a> vs. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drive.ru\/images\/chevrolet\/chevrolet-citation.jpg\">Citation<\/a> &#8211; there was no analog to the Chevette) was four percent. When the <a href=\"http:\/\/memimage.cardomain.net\/member_images\/9\/web\/825000-825999\/825689_1.jpg\">Pontiac T1000<\/a> came in 1981, its <a href=\"http:\/\/seattlepi.nwsource.com\/dayart\/wheels\/472_1981chevette.jpg\">Chevette<\/a> premium was but two percent. Mercury&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.messengerpuppet.com\/_photos\/1981%20001.jpg\">Zephyr<\/a> cost only three percent more than a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usaraud.ee\/ajuvant\/ford\/ford-fairmont80.jpg\">Ford Fairmont<\/a> (though <a href=\"http:\/\/webplus.locators.estates.co.uk\/eq\/p1.gif\">Bobcat&#8217;s<\/a> margin over <a href=\"http:\/\/www.izico.biz\/kiosquauto\/88zc.jpg\">Pinto<\/a> was a hefty 16 percent), while the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moparautos.com\/images\/80aspen.jpg\">Dodge Aspen<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.taunus-zodiac.ch\/images\/volare\/volare042.jpg\">Plymouth Volare<\/a> were actually priced the same. In fact, so were the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.davisengineering.net\/Jet_files\/image002.jpg\">Dodge Omni<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.geocities.com\/RainForest\/Vines\/5565\/007.gif\">Plymouth Horizon<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Big Three were not the only manufacturers to offer entry-level cars. Independents had them, too, though no single maker offered them consistently. In 1932, Hudson&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_Terra&#038;AmeliaWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of Amelia Earhart with 1932 Terraplane\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Terraplane<\/a> (christened by aviatrix <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ameliaearhart.com\/\">Amelia Earhart<\/a>) sold for ten dollars more than a Ford or Plymouth, forty dollars less than a Chevy. The low priced insurgent in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1940StudeChampWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1940 Studebaker Champion\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">1940<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2007-1-10_1950StudeChampWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1950 Studebaker Champion\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">1950<\/a> was the Studebaker Champion, and in 1960 the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2006-9-6_59RamblerAm2DWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of Rambler American sedan\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Rambler American<\/a> cost less than any of the Big Three compacts. Studebaker attempted inroads with the super-plain <a href=\"http:\/\/storm.tocmp.com\/studebakercs1957.htm\">Scotsman<\/a> in 1957-58 and the newly-shortened <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/images\/2006-9-6_59StudeLarkWeb-Large.jpg\"target=\"_blank\" title=\"illustration of 1959 Studebaker Lark\" target=\"_blank\"class=\"imglink\">Lark<\/a> made some headway in 1959. AMC came up with another price-leader, the ex-Gremlin $4,515 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.classiccars.net\/classinfo.html?ad=73+classiccars&#038;PHPSESSID=bd82b1b3800b718d149a2c0eba5be90b\">Spirit<\/a> in 1980.<\/p>\n<p>Fast-forward to 2001. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.greendayauthority.com\/site_images\/gavintreII.jpg\">Pontiac Sunfire<\/a> had a Sloan-like margin of eight percent over the <a href=\"http:\/\/images.securedwebform.com\/reviews\/images\/01cavalier.jpg\">Chevy Cavalier<\/a>. Mercury had nothing competing with Ford&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.auto-broker-magic.com\/images\/37b.jpg\">Focus<\/a>, its cheapest car, the <a href=\"http:\/\/craig.howell.net\/events\/2001sable.jpg\">Sable<\/a>, costing five percent more than a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.used-car-buffalo.com\/vehicles\/2001FORDTAURUS.jpg\">Taurus<\/a>. Dodge and Plymouth were competing with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.carseek.com\/car_images\/01neon.jpg\">Neons<\/a> that differed only in their badge decals; their price stickers were still exactly the same. With hindsight, we can opine that Plymouth was doomed a full forty years earlier by Chrysler&#8217;s rejection of Sloanism. And the Low-Priced Three? There were three 2001 cars sold in the US priced under $11,000. They were made by <a href=\"http:\/\/db.theautochannel.com\/db\/images\/2001831102.jpg\">Kia<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.canadiandriver.com\/testdrives\/images\/01accent_gs.jpg\">Hyundai<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/images.securedwebform.com\/stock\/300\/toyota\/echo\/2001\/4sa.jpg\">Toyota<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alfred P. Sloan&#8217;s doctrine of &#8220;a car for every purse and purpose&#8221; was firmly entrenched by the early 1930s. General Motors had a clear cascade of makes, from Cadillac at the top of the market to Chevrolet at the bottom. Walter Chrysler recognized the phenomenon, which led him to introduce price-leader Plymouth to balance his<span style=\"color:#aaa\">&#8230;.<\/span> <br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/2007\/01\/low-priced-three\/\">Read full article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2722","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2722"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2722\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3352,"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2722\/revisions\/3352"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kitfoster.com\/carport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}